![]() |
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,165
|
Makes sense. It's like the difference between a single larger turbo and two smaller ones.
Actually, my co-worker Jason has one of these cars. He likes it, except for two things. The car payments, and the heat-soak. He's got a piggy-back and is cranking 580 RWHP. It's pretty quick, and almost keeps up with my buddy's CTS-V, but after a while, it kinda loses its edge. He gets some pretty severe knock. But - yeah - he loves his. I've ridden in it. I don't see the draw. To each their own, but I'd prefer the M3. I'm just a performance-oriented mo-fo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 5,165
|
Quote: <div>Originally Posted by Alchemist it's an interesting design. each filter cleans air for 3 cylinders? Each filter is for each Turbo, each Turbo feeds 3 cylinders. Top filter (in photo) connects to tube # 8 Bottom filter (in photo) connects to tube # 13 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| --bavarian-technic--, www.bavariantechnic.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|